[This is an article originally
submitted to Articlesbase but was
rejected with the remark that it is overtly
promotional !]
Velammal Engineering College,
Chennai, recently organized the 7th
International and 43rd Annual ELTAI
Conference. The first Plenary session of the conference was engaged by Prof. N.S.Prabhu, former Deputy Head,
Department of Language and Literature, National University. He is
the legendary Indian teacher of English
who placed India on the world
Communicative Language Teaching map through the highly acclaimed ‘Bangalore
Project’.
The abstract of his talk entitled Plausibility
in Language Teaching was
circulated in the book of Abstracts to all the delegates, prior to the Conference:
The classroom is not just a place for learners to learn; it
is equally a place for teachers to develop a feel for the phenomenon of
learning and an ability to judge what is best done with a given class of
learners at a given time. Such ability can result in a greater fit between
learning tasks and learners’ readiness for them at different times and a
consequent enhancement of learning overall. This means that the methodology and
materials made available to teachers should aim not so much to promote learners’
learning regardless of teachers’
shortcomings but rather to encourage teachers to adapt/alter them to suit the
classes they teach and gradually to acquire a sense of plausibility about what
task is best for what learners at what point of time.
[P 1. Abstracts: The English Classroom-Experiments and Experiences, 7th International
and 43rd Annual ELTAI Conference. 19th to 21st
July 2012]
Prof. Prabhu delivered his talk in a
slow pace, sometimes repeating what was
uttered. This helped in note
making:
* There
are two problems in teaching:
1.We can plan our teaching, can observe
our teaching and control our teaching.
2. We cannot plan learning, observe learning or control learning.
* Learning is not even perceptible at
any time we are teaching.
* We can’t see the process of learning
but can see the product.
* So, what is learning...? Say, a child or adult is able to do something now- which
it/he/she was unable to do yesterday... then, there is a suggestion... that something has been learned.
* The essence of task-based teaching is
that learners have to continuously put in
an effort to learn. Progress is dependent on the effort of the learner- a
reasonable effort dependent on the capacity of the learner. This could
also mean that there is a series of unsuccessful effort in which
there is no learning. If there is no real effort, there would
not be any learning.
Problem # 1
* With reference to the Zone of
Proximal Development, (ZPD) it could be said that the learning task should be such that there is the possibility of the learner
succeeding in the task. For this, the task
must look achievable. For learning
to be in the area of Proximal
Development the task should not be too easy
nor too difficult.
Problem # 2
* We teach big/small groups of learners. It is an acknowledged fact that
siblings of the same family... learners from the same family, do not learn at
the same pace. Teaching will be uniform, but learning will not be uniform.
* Sometimes more than half the class
may have got the task wrong, or more than half the class may have performed the
task correctly. Accordingly, the teacher is expected to modify the task-make it
simple or complex.
* It is imperative on the part of the
teacher to check learner’s response regularly and to change the task regularly.
Here the teacher cannot be dependent on the Curriculum- developer. This then
leads to the moot issue- curriculum has to assume progress of learning.
But can the teacher in the
classroom judge?...some can from learner performance. Sometimes a learner may
have got something wrong... The more correct
the assessment of the teacher, the more the advantage for the learner.
* The teacher has to gradually become a curriculum setter who makes changes that are necessary. If a
teacher stops growing as a teacher, learning suffers... teaching suffers!
* Does it mean that there is no need for the curriculum or the
syllabus...? What we need is a curriculum of a different kind... not ones that frustrates
teachers’ work... but promotes it.
* For
a teacher to make up a task everyday is a problem. A teacher may require
a large collection of tasks ... so large, that cannot be exhausted in a year. They need to acquire the skill of
adapting tasks....